For recruiters
Check every application, not the one who already got an offer.
You are the person who sees the volume, and the person who gets blamed when a hire turns out to be someone else. The tools you are handed are either too slow to run on everyone, or so blunt that they filter on things you are not allowed to filter on.
The check happens too late
A background check runs on the finalist, after weeks of interviews. By then the cost of being wrong is the whole process, not one screening call.
The filters available are the wrong ones
Filtering on CV language, formatting or nationality is discriminatory and it does not work, because the fabricated applications are often the polished ones.
You cannot tell a quiet candidate from a fake one
A strong candidate with no online presence looks identical to an invented one in every tool that treats a thin footprint as suspicious.
Runs on everyone
The check sits at the top of the funnel and runs on every application, which is the only place where volume is the problem.
A thin footprint is never a finding
Absence of data is reported as not verified, in its own block, and it never counts against anyone.
Something you can actually say out loud
Every finding is a sentence with a register behind it, so you can raise it in a call as a question rather than an accusation.
You keep the decision
There is no reject button because there is no reject path. What the product does is give you a reason to look twice.
We do not have customer logos to show you yet. The pilot programme is how the first ones happen, and we would rather say that than borrow credibility we have not earned.
Ninety seconds is enough to see whether this is useful.
Run a check on a sample candidate and read what the report says.